Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Glynn Foster wrote: >> Alan Coopersmith wrote: >>> Eric Boutilier wrote: >>>>> It looks like there's 8 open defects & RFEs in defect.opensolaris.org and >>>>> 3 >>>>> open defects & RFE's in bugs.opensolaris.org related to the website. I'd >>>>> be >>>>> willing to work on any of them. Though it sounds from your e-mail that >>>>> someone needs to compile the list and initiate a discussion with the >>>>> community to prioritize them? >>>>> Is that something we can help with? >>>>> >>>> Yes, in my opinion, the consolidating/prioritizing task would be >>>> valuable too. >>> If anyone tackles that, there's a lot more than 3 open bugs. When I >>> query the bugster database internally, I get 106 open bugs in >>> solaris/opensolaris/websiteright now. Unfortunately, it looks like >>> getting the list out of bugs.opensolaris.org is a bit harder, since >>> you have to search each of the possible states. >> Would it be interesting to do a mass transfer from bugs.opensolaris.org to >> defect.opensolaris.org of that sub-category? Given most of those bugs would >> be >> related to opensolaris infrastructure, defect.opensolaris.org might be more >> appropriate for encouraging contributions. > > I think it would be interesting, especially if there's no integration with > any tools like WebRTI that the website team requires for their bugs - do we > have a good way to do this yet? > > Also, should bugs.os.o be modified to refer users to defect.os.o when filing > new website bugs?
I think it would be great to move it. There's no reason from our side not to. Once we move it we can just remove the cat/subcats and post a note on the main bug page telling people how to submit website bugs. Derek > -- Derek Cicero Program Manager Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
