Christoph; Can you take a look at the error log and see what messages it has? The underlying error may occur before the "General Ask Error" and may give you some hints on what construct is causing the problem.
The DIG standard is not complete and Pellet may be processing constructs that DIG has not caught up to yet. See http://dl.kr.org/dig/interface.html, where is it specifically states "The expressivity offered by DIG 1.1 is not sufficient to capture general OWL-DL ontologies — in particular datatype support is lacking in DIG 1.1 and there is a poor fit between DIG's notion of relations and OWL properties." However, work-arounds may be possible, depending on the specific error. -- Scott On Jan 27, 3:34 am, Christoph <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Recently, I tried to use Pellet 2.00 RC3/RC4 over DIG interface in > Topbraid 2.6.2, but when running the consistency check, I am getting > the error: > Dig Reasoner Error : General Ask Error[ID:]. The reasoner also doesn't > seem to add any new triples when running the inferences. > > Can you give me some hints? > > Thanks a lot, > Christoph --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
