Dear Holger, Scott Thanks a lot for your feedback. The subforms already help me out; the child derivations even more and of course I'll be hoping for some built-in support for QCR's in the future! Thx again, Michel
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Henninger [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: donderdag 19 november 2009 22:59 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [tbc-users] Decomposition tree Another thought is to use sub-forms. If you mouse-over the icon next to subClassOf (or any object property) a "+" appears. Click on the icon and you can explore the contents of that property. I've attached a screen shot of this example. This is a really convenient way of browsing and understanding your RDF and I find it invaluable for creating SPARQL queries. -- Scott Holger Knublauch wrote: Michel, how is your hasPart relationship defined? The Association tree should work on any object property. However, if you are looking for something such as a tree on QCRs, where the filler classes are the tree nodes, then we do not have an out of the box solution. But: you could infer the missing triples. For example: Assume you have Country part min 1 State State part min 1 City You could now create a pure UI property such as property child and create instances of that using SPARQL CONSTRUCT/SPIN. For example: CONSTRUCT { ?parentClass :child ?childClass } WHERE { ?parentClass rdfs:subClassOf ?restriction . ?restriction owl:onClass ?childClass . } Then infer the resulting triples and open the Associations view on them - see attachment. If QCRs turn out to be a common design pattern for this, then we could add more convenient support for this to the feature list. Regards Holger On Nov 19, 2009, at 2:37 AM, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote: Hi Holger, Scott, In my ontologies I use QCRs for modelling decomposition. This is very powerfull because it can involved child from different types. Is there a way to browse class and/or instance level such decompositiontree (instead of the specialization tree). When I do "show associations" it seems I cannot select my hasPart relationship there... Thx Michel This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=. This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=.
