Scott, I feel that you are missing the point. Scott Henninger wrote: > <So the question is now: is OWL/XML not better/simpler/moredirect for > this purpose than XML/RDF (as you suggest).> > > Maybe, it is a question for open investigation. But this is done at > the expense of important values in RDF, such as merging data. No. Providing the users of TBC with a function to export and import OWL/XML has absolutely no impact of the use and benefit of XML/RDF. None whatsoever. I'm sure that all users of TBC will continue to work with all the 'proper' semantic tools. That is the reason we have invested money in this product. But some of us are concerned about the lack of understanding in the xml community and we want to reach out and bridge that unfortunate gap. We see OWL/XML as a very good way to do just that.
This should not be a debate about whether or not OWL/XML is better than XML/RDF. This is a request for a much need function (for some of us) that is finally within reach. I hope that TopQuadrant will be willing to help with this. Regards, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=.
