- derivations using LET - cardinality constraints (not the same as the owl card constraints! since here they are are actually executed....you see violating content instead of content not being classified....I guess others can explain this difference better...) - many other constraints not feasible in owl
TNO.NL Michel Böhms Consultant Building Innovation TNO Built Environment and Geosciences Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6 | PO Box 49 2600 AA | Delft | The Netherlands Tel +31 888663107 E-mail [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Web http://www.linkedin.com/in/michelbohms Skype michelbohms Disclaimer<blocked::http://www.tno.nl/content.cfm?&context=overtno&content=overtnosub&laag1=282&item_id=72&Taal=2> ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of erwachen hzz Sent: woensdag 1 december 2010 1:40 To: [email protected] Subject: [topbraid-users] Advantages of SPIN SPARQL Hello, Can someone give me examples of general cases where some constraints can be expressed using SPIN SPARQL and not with OWL/RDFS ? Best regards! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
