On Dec 2, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:
>
>
> I see all that.
> Still I think there is conceptually someway room for a standardized layer on
> top of sparql (somehow) that standardizes the more semantic things the tools
> like jena now do in their implementation once they see the graph is an owl
> graph.
Yes, this is on track to be covered by SPARQL 1.1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/#Entailment
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer,
TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
