Right, thx! So my "owl-sparql" would actually sparql 1.1 addressing this, in some sense...
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch > Sent: donderdag 2 december 2010 10:05 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Advantages of SPIN SPARQL > > > On Dec 2, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote: > > > > > > > I see all that. > > Still I think there is conceptually someway room for a > standardized layer on top of sparql (somehow) that > standardizes the more semantic things the tools like jena now > do in their implementation once they see the graph is an owl graph. > > Yes, this is on track to be covered by SPARQL 1.1: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/#Entailment > > Holger > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which > include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, > SPARQLMotion and SPIN. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en > This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
