|
In particular, the restriction that an instance
cannot also be used as a class has been lifted in OWL 2. In particular, see http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-owl2-new-features-20090421/#F12:_Punning -- Scott On 1/26/11 12:31 PM, Bradley Shoebottom wrote: Scott, To put it simply, I was told to keep the ontology in OWL-DL so as to do reasoning better. I think it had to do something with in OWL Full that a Class and an instance could be the same making it difficult to isolate out the instances. -- |
- [topbraid-users] Syntax Checker? Leonard Jacuzzo
- Re: [topbraid-users] Syntax Checker? Holger Knublauch
- RE: [topbraid-users] Syntax Checker? Bradley Shoebottom
- [topbraid-users] Re: Syntax Checker? Scott Henninger
- RE: [topbraid-users] Re: Syntax Checke... Bradley Shoebottom
- [topbraid-users] Re: Syntax Check... Irene Polikoff
- Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Synt... Leonard Jacuzzo
- [topbraid-users] Re: Synt... Scott Henninger
- Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Syntax C... Scott Henninger
- Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Synt... Leonard Jacuzzo
- Re: [topbraid-users] Re: ... Scott Henninger
- Re: [topbraid-users] Re: ... Jeremy Carroll
- [topbraid-users] Re: Synt... Scott Henninger
- RE: [topbraid-users] Re: ... Irene Polikoff
- Re: [topbraid-users] Re: ... Leonard Jacuzzo
- [topbraid-users] Re: Synt... Scott Henninger
- Re: [topbraid-users] Re: ... Leonard Jacuzzo
- [topbraid-users] Re: Synt... Scott Henninger
- RE: [topbraid-users] Re: ... Irene Polikoff
