Dear all,
Once in a while we ask ourselves: what is the best way to model numerical
constraints.
In the past we used SPIN/SPARQL constraints but can't we do it more
rdf/rdfs/owl-based?
Like simple example: SmallCar being subclass of Car with length property where
SmallCar has length < 2 ('meter' acc. to nasa ont.)(Or subclasses for "requiredItems" as subclasses limiting the solution space in case of configuration processes). Kind of hasValue but then more flexible "hasLessThanValue etc. Guess all this is OWA-related like the examples in: http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/1476/expressing-constraints-using-rdfowl-or-something-else Any input very welcome, Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Sr. Research Scientist Technical Sciences T +31 (0)88 866 31 07 M +31 (0)63 038 12 20 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<http://www.tno.nl/locaties/dtm> Disclaimer<http://www.tno.nl/emaildisclaimer> [Description: C:\Users\bohmshm\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\TNO (EN)_files\logo_signature.gif]<http://www.tno.nl/> -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
<<inline: image001.gif>>
