Hello, Do SHACL property constraints for a given shape/class extend to reified statements where the subject of the statement is a SHACL instance?
For example, in the following, there are 2 people defined and a reified statement saying that inst:person-1 ex:knows inst:person-2. If there is closed shape for type 'Person' that does not provide a property constraint for 'ex:knows', should I expect a failure? If not, why? Thank you! Matt inst:person-1 rdf:type ex:Person ; . inst:person-2 rdf:type ex:Person ; . inst:statement-1 rdf:type rdf:Statement ; rdf:subject inst:person-1 ; rdf:predicate ex:knows ; rdf:object inst:person-2 ; . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
