I second.
As we are at it, I'm not sure that choosing "org.apache.db.torque" as a
package name was a good choice. "org.apache.torque" would have been better.
I propose to change this too.
Thomas
Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.05.2007 07:33:27:
> I propose that we prefix the current artifactId values in the maven 2
> POMs with "torque-" so that instead of having a jar called
> "runtime-3.3.jar we end up with "torque-runtime-3.3.jar".
>
> Any objections?
>
> Scott
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
