Not being a Maven 2 user, I'm not sure how to evaluate this. My main question here are:
What effect would this have on existing Ant / Maven 1 build processes? If changing jar name formats requires some build file changes, I'm not sure this is something to change in a release candidate cycle. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 1:33 AM > To: Apache Torque Developers List > Subject: Maven 2 pom artifactId values > > I propose that we prefix the current artifactId values in the > maven 2 POMs with "torque-" so that instead of having a jar > called "runtime-3.3.jar we end up with "torque-runtime-3.3.jar". > > Any objections? > > Scott > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Duke CE Privacy Statement Please be advised that this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential and are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you may not rely on the contents of this email or any attachments, and we ask that you please not read, copy or retransmit this communication, but reply to the sender and destroy the email, its contents, and all copies thereof immediately. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
