Thomas Fischer wrote: > I second. > > As we are at it, I'm not sure that choosing "org.apache.db.torque" as a > package name was a good choice. "org.apache.torque" would have been better. > I propose to change this too. > > Thomas > > Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.05.2007 07:33:27: > >> I propose that we prefix the current artifactId values in the maven 2 >> POMs with "torque-" so that instead of having a jar called >> "runtime-3.3.jar we end up with "torque-runtime-3.3.jar". >> >> Any objections? >> >> Scott
+1 on both proposals Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
