Greg Monroe wrote: > One thing that comes to mind about changing package names > is the potential need to for backward compatiblity. One > of the main reasons to "adopt" Village is so that the > source that all versions of Torque depends on is not lost. > IMHO, if we change package names, we still have to find a > place to keep the original source "alive".
Just to make myself clear: I don't want to change the package names, the discussion was about whether we are legally required to do so or not. > That said, I'd say the best way to import this would be to > create a new Village sub project and put it there. This > was probably the unstated plan... but I figured I'd say it. If we cannot get agreement on the inclusion of Village now I will not make a second attempt. YMMV Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
