Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I brought up your comments with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and they basically > said you are wrong. I can hand the code over to you to include with > Torque without much difficulty at all. There is no difference between me > contributing this code as a package and me checking it in directly as > I'm both an ASF member and I've signed all the agreements already. > > If you want the code, it's yours. If not, then it's getting put in the > trashcan.
How do we proceed here? I wanted to call for a release vote but I would rather sort this out before. Is it possible to use the Village code as it is (2.0, I mean)? Then we could simply wrestle it and check it in. Or do we have to change the packages and all imports That would be a PITA because at least Record is probably used by most of the Torque applications. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
