Thomas Vandahl wrote:
How do we proceed here? I wanted to call for a release vote but I would
rather sort this out before. Is it possible to use the Village code as
it is (2.0, I mean)? Then we could simply wrestle it and check it in. Or
do we have to change the packages and all imports That would be a PITA
because at least Record is probably used by most of the Torque applications.
I did ask on members@ whether or not it would be okay for us to retain
the existing package names. There was a little discussion over whether
or not we could import this code (which we can) but nobody raised any
concerns about the package naming (i.e. the question to which I made
serious efforts to point the discussion towards was ignored and I am
interpreting this as "there are no serious concerns with this").
Since Torque is the responsibility of the DB PMC I will raise this on
general@ so that there is an opportunity for objections to be raised there.
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
