+1 on m2.
How about for 4.0 we drop support for Java versions earlier than 5?
Comments?
Scott
Jeffrey Brekke wrote:
I vote moving to m2 completly. The m2 plugin is working fine here.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.03.2008 08:54:30:
> Thomas Fischer wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the tedious release work, Thomas !
>
> Yeah, thanks. We *must* do something about the release process...
IMHO, chucking the maven 1 build (and decide what to do with the maven a
plugin) and change the svn structure.
I saw that you used a signing plugin. Was that m1 or m2, and did it work
well ?
> If you feel like branching for version 4.0, please do.
I'd rather have a plan which is agreed on by all and some discussion before
that.
Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
