Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Scott Eade wrote:
+1 on m2.
How about for 4.0 we drop support for Java versions earlier than 5?
Comments?
-1
That would throw me out of the game for some time to come. 1.4 would
be fine, however.
I would be interested in knowing whether or not you might be able to
turn the situation the other way around. Perhaps by suggesting that
Java 5 is possibly going to be a requirement it may provide the powers
that be with some motivation to move forward.
In any case, I would imagine that if it had the potential to knock out
one of our core committers then we would not do it.
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
