+1 On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on m2. > > How about for 4.0 we drop support for Java versions earlier than 5? > Comments? > > Scott > > > > Jeffrey Brekke wrote: > > I vote moving to m2 completly. The m2 plugin is working fine here. > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.03.2008 08:54:30: > >> > >> > >> > Thomas Fischer wrote: > >> > > Thanks a lot for the tedious release work, Thomas ! > >> > > >> > Yeah, thanks. We *must* do something about the release process... > >> > >> IMHO, chucking the maven 1 build (and decide what to do with the maven a > >> plugin) and change the svn structure. > >> I saw that you used a signing plugin. Was that m1 or m2, and did it work > >> well ? > >> > >> > >> > If you feel like branching for version 4.0, please do. > >> > >> I'd rather have a plan which is agreed on by all and some discussion > before > >> that. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thomas > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
-- Jeffrey D. Brekke Wisconsin, USA brekke at apache dot org ekkerbj at gmail dot com jbrekke at wi dot rr dot com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
