On 17-04-2010 19:33, Steve Borho wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Sune Foldager <sune.folda...@me.com> wrote: >> Could we please create separate branches (qtdev/qtstable) or a separate >> repo for this? It would be nice to keep the existing code clean of QT >> experiments. > > I don't see the need for this; the Qt port will be in a separate > folder under the tortoisehg package.
Well, it will confuse the history, and the two projects are, as you almost say yourself below, not very connected. I don't see why you would want them in the same repo or branch. > Let me re-iterate, I don't see a lot to be gained by trying to share > code between GTK and Qt. Right. > Feel free to copy pieces of the hgtk folder > wholesale to hgqt as necessary. The long term goal will be for all > new development to happen in the hgqt folder, and for hgtk to be in > maintenance mode, keeping it up-to-date with Mercurial API changes and > fixing bugs. Hmm, I think we need another name; hgqt is not easy to type or remember for lusers. ...might even go as keeping hgtk, or maybe thg. /Sune ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
