On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Colin
Caughie<c.caug...@indigovision.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doug Philips [mailto:d...@mac.com]
>> Sent: 24 June 2009 20:54
>> To: Steve Borho
>> Cc: tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [thg] One week to go
>>
>> On or about Wednesday, June 24, 2009, at 03:45PM, Steve Borho
>> indited:
>> >2) Enabling this feature is a non-trivial step, and I prefer to
>> >require people to RTFM and understand what it is exactly that they
>> are
>> >enabling.
>
> OK that's fair enough.
>
>> Thank you. I don't want to have to tell my team not to enable it.
>> Part of the problem with that option is that it seems to simple, and
>> yet it can cause -such- havoc. :(
>
> I've certainly seen it cause havoc if some people working on a repo have it 
> enabled and others don't. Is this what you mean? I guess that in itself is a 
> good reason not to have TortoiseHG make it easy to enable. The last SCM tool 
> we used had line ending conversion enabled by default and made it difficult 
> to turn off, so that was never a problem.
>
> Perhaps the solution for us would be to create a custom installer for our 
> organization that doesn't give the option _not_ to install it; that way 
> there's less chance that someone can mess up the repo having different 
> settings from everyone else.

If your organization has a policy that the extension should always be
enabled with a specific filter set, then by all means create a custom
installer with a Mercurial.ini that has the configuration you desire.
Or perhaps package the installer with a batch file that enforces your
policies.  I see no problem with that at all.

--
Steve Borho

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss

Reply via email to