On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Steve Borho <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Michael Jay Lippert > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I miss the stars in the graph next to the new changesets that were just > > pulled. > > I found them irritating after a while, so they've been low on my list > of features to port. I wouldn't object to them being added to the Qt > port, but it will be some time before I get around to adding them > myself. > > After using the workbench for day-to-day Mercurial work for a few > months now, I've found I now prefer post-pull of None and manually > update after examining the pulled changesets. Newly pulled changesets > are quite obvious in the graph when the working parent has not moved. > > It's nice not blindingly updating after each pull. It feels more > civilized, but YMMV. > > Actually I have always used a post-pull of None, and manually update. And > actually that's why I miss the stars, because I frequently don't update, so > I'll pull today, and then in a couple of days, and then again, never > updating, and w/o the stars I can't distinguish what was pulled the 3rd time > from what I pulled the previous 2 times. > > And that same scenario applies when the "current" changeset is on one > branch and all of the pulled changes are being done on a different branch. > Then it is still not possible to identify (after the pull) which changesets > were just pulled. > > I appreciate all the work you do on TortoiseHg Steve, and I'm just glad to > hear that you didn't decide to get rid of the stars, they're just lower on > your personal priority list, which is fine, I would expect you to get the > pieces you want most done first :-). > > Mike >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
