The offer from VisualSVN is very generous, however considering the recent development of the EU CRA regulations, see for example [1], and the uncertainty of wether accepting recurring donations from a commercial entity would would make the whole project "commercial" (=> ie, bringing in a significant bit of paperwork for each release), I would kindly say "no" at the moment.
That leaves Sourceforge as the only reasonable alternative at the moment. I'm fine with that (and I already have an account). Kind regards, Daniel Sahlberg [1] https://news.apache.org/foundation/entry/save-open-source-the-impending-tragedy-of-the-cyber-resilience-act tisdag 25 juli 2023 kl. 19:54:36 UTC+2 skrev Stefan: > So no objections to move everything (back) to sourceforge? > If not, I'll first mark the osdn.net repo as readonly, then get the sf > repo working and finally adjust all links of the website and everywhere > else to sf. > I think all people who have commit access to the osdn.net repo also have > commit access to the sf.net repo? If not, give me a shout. > > Stefan > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TortoiseSVN-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tortoisesvn-dev/4afff71a-de52-416e-b0d8-d31763536662n%40googlegroups.com.
