mortslim;517910 Wrote: > ... > (Some long explanations, I wonder about what) > ... This doesn't tell me in which aspect recording equipment was "worse" 30 years ago. In you long "explanation" I see nothing about sound quality differences that could make it through the editing process end to the consumer. I can only see that suddenly you left your "inaudible" differences (of the 24/96, earlier) to get into some other (now miraculously audible) theoretical differences.
You are talking about DDD disks, but you nicely elude that most of them were mixed through an analog SSL up to recently ? Perhaps you don't know about it ? :D I would even say that the whole recording process is *much* worse for most of the recorded/sold popular music : to the point that most albums today are not even worth listening to. This is *fact* and no some kind of theoretical analysis. I think you should revise you religion. Because al you "explanations" are good only for believers. And tell me which today's album of pop/rock is better (according to you) recorded than 73's Wyatt's Rock Bottom, for instance ? -- Themis SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Croft 25Pre and Series 7 power - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14700 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74688 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
