iPhone;519966 Wrote: > Again why? Anything above 24/96 for playback is a waste of hard drive > space, time and money. There is nobody that can hear the slightest > difference/improvement between 24/96 and 24/192. Sure it is fine to > produce 24/96 from master 24/192 recordings but nobody needs to pay for > or store for playback 24/192. > > This isn't my opinion its just the reality of human hearing.
What is your opinion then? 176.4/24 and 192/24 sound better than 96/24 even on Transporter downsampled via Sox to 96/24 And for sure, they sound much better on Weiss Minerva at their native rate "sound better" == in my system. High-resolution drivers and full-range speaker system with good dynamic range does not come cheap. -- michael123 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74688 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
