HI, thanks for the reply. couple of points if I may? Mnyb;583003 Wrote: > Should you not up sample CD to 88.2 (2*44.1) not 96 ? you will degrade > the signal a tiny bit if it's not a multiple of original sample rate ? > SHOULD I? I HAVE HEARD THIS CAN BE A BETTER WAY TO DO IT, BUT I'M NOT > SURE. ANY THOUGHTS? > > _And_Touch_already_put_out_16_bit_as_24_bit._ > DOES IT? DO YOU MEAN THE TOUCH WILL AUTOMATICALLY OUTPUT MY 16/44 FLACS > AS 24 BIT TO MY DAC THROUGH ITS DIGITAL OUT? > > And if the external DAC has up sampling then your good to go no real > need to do it at the file level . > IT DOESN'T > > Supose SOX has a lot of dither and filter options that can be used ? to > tweak the result a bit ? the dithering options is said to sound > different ? > > are the resulting foobar2000 files of the same level so not the 24b one > done by foobar is louder ? The foobar upsampåler does it come with lot > of options that potentially could change the sound ? > (AS FAR AS I KNOW IT DOESN;T. I ONLY USE THE SOX RESAMPLER TO UPSAMPLE > TO 24/96) > > _You_can_not_really_get_more_info_out_of_16/44.1_by_uppsampling._ > YEAH, I KNOW YOU DONT GET MORE INFORMATION AS SUCH, BUT THERE ARE > ADVANTAGES IN MY OPINION, IN THAT THE \"BRICK WALL\" FILTER FREQUENCIES > ARE MOVED HIGHER UP OUTWITH THE HEARING RANGE WHICH MAYBE ACCOUNTS FOR > THE BETTER SOUND I'M HEARING AFTER UPSAMPLING? > THERE IS DEFINATELY AN IMPROVEMENT TO MY EARS. >
So thanks for the reply, I had another go at making SoX work within Squeezecentre...still no dice. Still looking for a helping hand, thanks! :) -- Gazjam ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82672
_______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
