bpa;608164 Wrote: 
> Has network statistics been examined ?
> 
> Has anybody counted the number of data packets being sent ?  Does it
> change between different settings ? It's possible that there is a TCP
> segmentation issue and packets are segmented differently according to
> different settings.
> 
> Has error / retrans counts on router, server and Touch been checked to
> see whether one if the system is having more problems (e.g. being
> overloaded) with one settings compared to the other.
> 
> Since many Linux system have a common source for the Ethernet driver
> which is different to Windows - the issue could be in the driver.
> 
> Wireshark could be used to compare network streams to see whether the
> settings change affects the contents of the packets or the dynamics of
> the packet stream.
> 
> Can the Windows TCP registry or device manager settings be changed to
> match the "bad settings" to see if SQ of Windows server can be
> downgraded.

Finally somebody with constructive feedback.

Yep - we tested windows with - "bad settings" - how you call it. 
(I guess you mean the half duplex part). I just call it a setting.


Linux driver issue: As you've seen people compared a Linux based NAS
with W7. And here the result was "similar".

I even tested on a 2.6.38-rc2 kernel. Just to make sure to have the
newest driver on board.

Feel free to run the traces. I do regard all this as a community
effort.


-- 
soundcheck

'soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0'
(http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com/2011/01/soundchecks-squeezebox-touch-toolbox-20.html)
|| 'soundcheck's Touch Toolbox - Beta Blog'
(http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com/2011/01/soundchecks-tt-beta-blog.html)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
soundcheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34383
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to