Kim Kruse;667896 Wrote: > I went from several Squeezeboxes to end up with Sonos. Much better > system architecture, much higher stability. Of course you should > consider Sonos. > You wont regret.
I don't get why people keep saying that Sonos has a better architecture and better stability. I think the Squeezebox stability mostly depends on the stability of your network. Sonos is also more limiting. Sonos: 65.000 track limit (which can be as low as 40.000-45.000, depending on your tags) Sonos: HD Audio, what's that? (Limited to 44.100Khz/16bit) No 3rd party extensions. What I also don't get is that they refuse to upgrade their hardware to better specs, so these limits wouldn't be an issue anymore. Even the latest hardware has to deal with these issues. (Based on the same 10 year old architecture) This does't mean that you shouldn't consider Sonos, it's a good concept. What's more, there's a company behind it that's dedicated to the product. -- verypsb 1x Boom, 1x Classic, 2x Controller, 2x Receiver, 1x Touch Please vote for bug 1330: new music should work on creation date http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330 Please vote for bug 17205: Artists with accented characters not correctly sorted in pagebar. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17205 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ verypsb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17295 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91228 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
