> > >> In general I would like to see toybox focus on clean, POSIX > > >> compilant replacements of the basic utilities (thing core/find > > >> utils, sed, awk etc) instead of duplicating stuff like tmux. > > > >
I agree this is best, atleast for 1.0 > > > Agreed. The only reason why I mentioned tmux is because Rob > > > mentioned[1], in passing, the idea of putting screen into Toybox. > > > If he puts in any terminal multiplexer, I'd prefer tmux instead of > > > screen. But, in truth, I too would be happier if toybox would > > > focus on the basics rather than on terminal multiplexers. :) > > > > I have a list of things I might add after the 1.0 release. For 1.0, > > the existing roadmap is _plenty_. > > My guess is that neither screen nor tmux would be added to toybox, but > something a bit more generic, engineered from the ground up, and with > screen and tmux compatible front ends (probably even abduco and dvtm > as well). None of them has any sort of standard as far as I know. And > yeah, post 1.0 release. > > Laugh, cry, or shake your heads. I just found out about screens/tmux/multiplexers from this email string and all I have to say is ctrl-a S and ctrl-a | are awsome! This reinforces my love for cli and i cant wait to start making use of ssh screen -dR just as soon as i figure out why my laptop hates it. If it does make its way to toybox im in favor of these features.
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
