On 10/17/21 2:48 PM, Eric Molitor wrote: > Let me take a look at signify I'll also send the missing part of the patch > with > -ltls shortly. > > Alpine has libtls, either the openssl port in the libretls package or the > original openbsd lbressl-tls. For my embedded stuff I'm statically linking > BearSSL and https://github.com/michaelforney/libtls-bearssl > <https://github.com/michaelforney/libtls-bearssl>
It's good that there are multiple libraries agreeing on an interface. > I've not looked at Denny's implementation. But will take a peak at what he is > doing. I too am curious, but it's way down my todo heap. > And yes, this violates the library policy, although I'd rather leverage a > relatively known good TLS rather than implement a new one. I'm all for having a library version _and_ a builtin version. But merging the library version in the absence of the builtin version won't move it out of pending. (That said, a more useful version in pending isn't bad. And it does need the plumbing upgraded to understand https...) Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
