On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Tim Ansell wrote: > > TP05 may need to drop the in-sequence requirement for messages. > > In-sequence requirement?
I believe he thinks that messages with a single sequence number have to occur one after another, ie sequence numbers: 1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,6,6,6,6 whereas the spec actually allows any interleaving, ie: 1,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,3,3,3,6,6,3,6,3,6 > Tim 'Mithro' Ansell Later Lee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
