On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 23:39 +1300, Lee Begg wrote: > On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Tim Ansell wrote: > > > TP05 may need to drop the in-sequence requirement for messages. > > > > In-sequence requirement? > > I believe he thinks that messages with a single sequence number have to occur > one after another, ie sequence numbers: > > 1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,6,6,6,6 > > whereas the spec actually allows any interleaving, ie: > 1,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,3,3,3,6,6,3,6,3,6 >
libtpproto-py already supports this properly. It's the whole point of sequence numbers (as well as async frames and real pipelining). :) No server currently returns out-of-sequence frames yet however. tpserver-py might be the first when twisted support is added (which adds support for deferred SQL execution). Maybe there is something wrong in the documentation? Tim 'Mithro' Ansell _______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
