Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > I know this has come up before, but the false positive rate for Askimet > on t.e.o is getting to be problematic. Just as an off-the-top-of-my-head > proposal to improve, could we add some kind of karma tracking system? > Start each anonymous session at a fixed karma (lets say 10), and only > allow them to post thing while that stays over a threshhold. SpamFilter > would run its tests on each submission, and set it up something like -1 > karma for each failed test, +0.1 for each passed one. While this would > probably let through more spam than the current setup, I think the > number of people that might be turned off from using Trac (or from > writting docs/bug reports) is even worse. I have been helping Alec with > spam monitoring (and deleting) on trac-hacks, and would be happy to help > on t.e.o too. > > --Noah
I have myself a few times problems to add comments to tickets. Today, new tickets and even comments to a ticket http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/4019 were rejected with a simple "Akismet rejected spam". This makes using trac difficult and has a _very_ demotivating effect. . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
