Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > -On [20061025 17:54], Ilias Lazaridis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Personally, I'd prefer not having to read up on stuff on another site when > >> it doesn't even add any value to the actual ticket, which I feel is often > >> the case with the links you post. > > > >I post normally just one link, which is the context (normally working plan or > >a ticket). > > > >someone can find relevant information, otherone can ignore it fully. > > And what if the linked to site goes out of working order? You get tickets with > references that are broken. Thus you disrupt the flow of the ticket.
I see! > Either put the stuff directly in a ticket or don't. Please. What you state is valid not for my links but for any link, including the trac's ones. (btw: I place redirections when I move content, thus the link does not break. e.g.: http://lazaridis.com/case/persist ) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
