On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:06:13PM +0200, Eirik Schwenke wrote: <snip/> > > Its easier to write Trac wiki than ReST. I also find it more human > > readable. As a big fan of markdown languages, I was very enamored > > with ReST a few years ago. Now, I think its mostly awful, not that > > there aren't things about Trac wiki that I would change. > > > > Interesting, maybe I'm at the point you were a few years ago. One great > advantage I failed to mention in favour of TracWikiMarkup, is ofcourse > wiki links -- it's perhaps one of the biggest failings of ReST.
Just as a point of clarity, while wiki has come to mean (markdown formatting) + (linking syntax), I think of the two quite differently. Linking + macros could (and IMHO should) be done as post-processing regardless of what the underlying markdown formatting is. Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
