On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 2:34:20 AM UTC-8, Mo wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016 13:28:25 UTC+1 schrieb Mo: >> >> All in all, also because the format=hierarchy looks better, I would >> prefer the real subwiki approach, changing the Index page to >> format=hierarchy. >> > > My current Index page: > > [[TitleIndex(format=hierarchy,min=1)]] > > I prefer the real subwiki approach like Projects/Foo/Roadmap, as it allows > browsing from child wikis up to parent wikis. > > format=hierarchy has the advantage that subwikis don't repeat the complete > wiki path, looking better: > > Projects > Projects-common > ProductionServers > Projects > Hss > Roadmap > Sub > Roadmap > > I created also Wikis for the parent wikis, but the index does not > hyperlink the parents but adds aditional "Projects" wiki. This is a bug, no? > > Switching to format=group, the issue is the same, plus the very > unattractive repeating of the whole wiki path: > > - Projects > - Projects-common/ProductionServers > - *Projects* > > - *Hss* > - Projects/Hss > - Projects/Hss/Roadmap > - *Sub* > - Projects/Sub > - Projects/Sub/Roadmap > > I can reproduce. The issue looks like a defect, but please search existing tickets before creating a new ticket.
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-ccYPw_HDRbQ/Vsl44evZX9I/AAAAAAAAC3s/L2U7WHLMCBY/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2016-02-21%2Bat%2B00.41.14.png> > As the real index is growing very large, both styles are far from optimal. > Displaying generic index is a very important feature. I also like to have > Sub-Index on parent pages if there is no custom content on parent wikis. I > would also like to have that automatically if there is no explicit parent > wiki created. > I'm unsure what you mean by sub-index. I will take a guess at what I think you mean. Suppose the page Projects/Rss/Roadmap exists, but Projects/Rss does not. I think you mean that you would like Rss to be in the hierarchy, like the following: <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-kUX1gClxG0U/Vsl5uDZiDYI/AAAAAAAAC30/EJ1OJeifhYg/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2016-02-21%2Bat%2B00.46.19.png> But since I get that result with Trac 1.0.10, I wonder what feature is missing? > If you agree and there is no work-around, I would like to file this issue > as a Trac-ticket. > > Best regards, > Mo > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/trac-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
