On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:59:33 +0100 Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Good wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 08:33 -0600, Russ Brown wrote: > >> Help! > >> > >> Our QA department want to stop using Trac for handling bug reports > >> and ... > >> > >> I've seen a number of emails on this list and wiki pages regarding > >> flexible workflow for trac tickets, which looks like they would be > >> very useful to us in our battle against the Word insanity, but I > >> don't seem to able to find any new progress on it, or any sign > >> that it will be come part of trac proper (we're reluctant to use > >> patches in a production environment). > > > > Alec Thomas has started development on this in the sandbox. There's > > been some discussion on the trac-dev mailing list, so you can check > > the archives, or subscribe to that list if you want to participate > > in the discussion. > > ... and I think it's already quite usable: when I tested it a few > days ago, everything worked fine; you may want to have a try by > yourself: > > svn checkout http://svn.edgewall.com/repos/trac/sandbox/workflow > > Simple workflows can be configured directly in the trac.ini file. > It is possible to write more complex workflows as plugins. > > See http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/wiki/WorkFlow > Thanks, I'll take a look. Does this require any changes to the trac database that would make it incompatible with the trunk codebase? I'm wondering if I'll be able to run this in parallel with our existing installation for testing and evaluation purposes. -- Russ _______________________________________________ Trac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
