At the very least, something is *different* with his radio.  As soon as 
I have time, I'm going to capture some audio off the TNC connector and 
see what's going on.

Scott

Rudy wrote:
>  
> 
> 
> Been there, done that, I already have the 1.2 board. The radio is on 
> Scott's bench, he agrees, something wrong with the radio.
> 
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com>, 
> "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeff...@...> wrote:
>  >
>  > If you get a T2-135 v1.2 board, they work MUCH better. My first one was
>  > lousy. The V1.2 has more filtering or something. I'm VERY pleased with
>  > the two I have now. KJ4ERJ-9 and KJ4OVQ-9 are both Alincos with T2-135
>  > V1.2 boards and Nuvi 350s on the dash. Wonderfully streamlined
>  > installations! I was doing JOTA contacts with them via APRS messaging
>  > today and actually did RF-IS-RF to Buenos Aires!
>  >
>  > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - A very satisfied T2-135 owner
>  >
>  > Rudy wrote:
>  > > I sure would like to see a better T2-135. My Alinco has never 
> worked right. Scott is pouring some magic smoke into my radio.
>  > >
>  > > --- In [email protected] 
> <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com>, "Keith VE7GDH" <ve7gdh@> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >> Scott N1VG wrote...
>  > >>
>  > >>
>  > >>> The price of the OT2m is going to be going up a bit when the next
>  > >>> batch comes in (mostly to cover the added component cost, especially
>  > >>> for the demodulator) so order now if you want to get one for the
>  > >>> current price.
>  > >>>
>  > >> Will orders placed now use the original PCB v1.0 or will they be 
> filled
>  > >> with the new v2.0 when they come in? Does the new board use a 
> different
>  > >> demodulator than before?
>  > >>
>  > >> Are there any updates planned for the T2-135?
>  > >>
>  > >> 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH
>  > >> --
>  > >> "I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"
>  > >>
>  > >>
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > ------------------------------------
>  > >
>  > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
> 
> 

Reply via email to