Depends. If I license a DSP modem, that won't be an option. If I have to do it myself or adapt another open source implementation, then certainly.
Scott Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote: > > > Open Sourcing the DSP version? I sure hope so! I haven't done it yet, > but one reason I went with the T2 and the OT2m is the fact that I can > change the code if I ever get inspired. And the DSP will (hopefully) > give us a more forgiving demodulator! I'm all for it! > > Lynn (D ) - KJ4ERJ > > Scott Miller wrote: > > The OT2m v2.0 does use a different demodulator, yes. There's more > > information here: > > > > http://n1vg.blogspot.com/2009/09/ot2m-version-20.html > <http://n1vg.blogspot.com/2009/09/ot2m-version-20.html> > > > > I'll consider updating the T2-135 again after the current batch is gone. > > Honestly, I'm hoping to have a DSP system going before then. > > > > Scott > > > > Keith VE7GDH wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Scott N1VG wrote... > >> > >> > There are a few more v1.0 boards being finished, but I think at this > >> > point they're all allocated to existing orders. The rest will be > >> > filled with 2.0 boards. > >> > >> Thanks for the info. I'll hold off ordering for a week or two. ;-) > >> > >> Does the new board use a different demodulator than before? > >> > >> Are there any updates planned for the T2-135? > >> > >> 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH > >> -- > >> "I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!" > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > >
