On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Luis Villa<[email protected]> wrote:
> So, I guess I assumed that the X deleted the dependency, rather than
> making it return; now that I understand the behavior it makes more
> sense. Maybe using language other than 'remove'? (But admittedly I
> don't have a good suggestion on that right now.) A couple notes on it:
>
> * before the patch, there was some explanatory text when you hovered
> over the X. This seems to be broken now?

The new commit (plus a hard reload- perhaps this was part of the
problem the other day?) has fixed this very cleanly. Thanks!

> * when I hit the X on the main page, the successor action is removed
> from the preceding action but doesn't show up again until a refresh,
> so it looks like it was deleted. This works as expected in the project
> view- weird.

Recent commit seems to fix this, thanks!
Luis
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to