Great! /Henrik
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Luis Villa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Luis Villa<[email protected]> wrote: > > So, I guess I assumed that the X deleted the dependency, rather than > > making it return; now that I understand the behavior it makes more > > sense. Maybe using language other than 'remove'? (But admittedly I > > don't have a good suggestion on that right now.) A couple notes on it: > > > > * before the patch, there was some explanatory text when you hovered > > over the X. This seems to be broken now? > > The new commit (plus a hard reload- perhaps this was part of the > problem the other day?) has fixed this very cleanly. Thanks! > > > * when I hit the X on the main page, the successor action is removed > > from the preceding action but doesn't show up again until a refresh, > > so it looks like it was deleted. This works as expected in the project > > view- weird. > > Recent commit seems to fix this, thanks! > Luis >
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
