I set a tentative date of April 30th for the 2.0 release when I re-named
1.8. How does that sound to everybody? Maybe we do the RC at the end of
April and release in May?

I just closed 10 tickets today and pushed a few more off to 2.1, so the pile
is looking really manageable. What else is blocking 2.0RC1?

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Eric Allen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, we could do a 1.7.1 with just the last bug fix.
>
> Okay, that makes sense. If we could get download stats, that would be a
> great way of figuring out how many users are keeping up enough to see a
> minor release.
>
> I assume 2.0 still takes weeks to get ready for RC and some time for final
>
> Yeah, even with the reduced # of tickets, it's still going to take quite a
> bit of work, and I'm struggling to finish off my last semester of college,
> so yeah, interim releases are good.
>
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Reinier Balt wrote:
>
> Well, we could do a 1.7.1 with just the last bug fix. Close 1.7 then and
> concentrate on 2.0. I assume 2.0 still takes weeks to get ready for RC and
> some time for final
>
> Reinier
>
>  *Van:* Eric Allen [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 22 maart 2010 15:03
> *Aan:* Reinier Balt
> *CC:* track-discuss
> *Onderwerp:* Re: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release
>
>
> Awesome! Thanks for cleaning up the tickets. This makes 2.0 look a lot more
> manageable. Should we just move the remaining 1.7.1 tickets over to 2.0,
> since we're giving up on that release?
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Reinier Balt <[email protected]> wrote:
> For 1.7.1 I reduced the tickets to a few that are relevant and present in
> 2.0 too, including one that makes your database inconsistent.
> I closed some of them because of your jQuery work, i.e. not fixing stuff
> that is fixed for 2.0.
>
> I removed myself from a lot of tickets so other can pick them up. I hope to
> fix some of the recurring todo tickets.
>
> Reinier
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Eric Allen
> Verzonden: zondag 14 maart 2010 22:18
> Aan: track-discuss
>
> Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release
>
> I think before we even think about a pre-release, we need to whittle down
> the number of tickets to a reasonable level. Reinier, you have a ton of
> Accepted tickets. Do you want to push some of those off to 2.1, New, or
> assign them to me?
>
> As for 1.7.1, which of those tickets are still an issue in master?
>
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:20 AM, Reinier Balt wrote:
>
> > We could go for a pre-release which gives us some more testing of the
> > current development tree.
> > There is a 1.7.1 bug that is impacting 1.8 too. I think we could forget
> > about releasing 1.7.1
> > given the available time :-(
> >
> > I'll try to pick up some of the recurring stuff the coming days, but my
> > spare time is very much
> > fragmented lately.
> >
> > Reinier
> >
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] Namens BSAG
> > Verzonden: zondag 7 maart 2010 15:52
> > Aan: Eric Allen
> > CC: track-discuss
> > Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release
> >
> > On 07/03/2010 0:23, Eric Allen wrote:
> >> We really need to push out a new release of Tracks in the near future,
> >> here. Dependencies and the jQuery stuff seem to be pretty stable at this
> >> point, so I think we're close! The major outstanding issues seem to be
> >> surrounding recurring todos. Reinier, care to chime in? We have almost
> >> 50 open tickets on milestone 1.8 right now, so we need to start pushing
> >> things out. I'm not an admin on Assembla, so I can't create a 2.0
> >> milestone. Reinier or bsag, can you make me an admin so I can move
> >> things around for the release?
> >
> > I'm even more busy than ever, I'm afraid, so I'm not going to have much
> > time to help out :-(
> >
> > However, I have added you as an admin on Assembla, Eric, so you should
> > be able to move things around now.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > bsag
> >
> > --
> > but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek
> > http://www.rousette.org.uk
> > [email protected]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tracks-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to