Thanks for pitching in, Orlando! The patches were simple enough that I can just manually add them, so submitting them as comments works fine. Are you working with a git working copy of Tracks or a downloaded snapshot? If you've gotten the source with "git clone", you can just run "git diff > foo.patch" to generate a patch file that's really easy for us to apply. Anything works though, if you're contributing! ;-)
For #898: The tracks.js file is actually a bundle created by Rails automatically, so you need to go back and edit the appropriate source .js file and delete the tracks.js file to regenerate it. I've committed your changes, and it's much better! Thanks for tracking that down. As for #843, I can't seem to duplicate the issue. Can you post a more specific scenario to reproduce the bug? On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Orlando Richards <[email protected]>wrote: > I've been inspired to see if I could help at all - so I've submitted > comments to a couple of tickets. Perhaps naively, I reckon they can just be > patched into the source (by someone who knows how to do that - I have no > chance!) and closed. > > Tickets are: > > 843 Newline rendering in notes is scetchy. > > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/843-newline-rendering-in-notes-is-scetchy- > > 898 Edit popup for actions goes away too quickly > > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/898-edit-popup-for-actions-goes-away-too-quickly > > Hope that's of some use! > > -- > Orlando. > > > > On 02/04/2010 18:47, Eric Allen wrote: > >> I set a tentative date of April 30th for the 2.0 release when I re-named >> 1.8. How does that sound to everybody? Maybe we do the RC at the end of >> April and release in May? >> >> I just closed 10 tickets today and pushed a few more off to 2.1, so the >> pile is looking really manageable. What else is blocking 2.0RC1? >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Eric Allen <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Well, we could do a 1.7.1 with just the last bug fix. >>> >> Okay, that makes sense. If we could get download stats, that would >> be a great way of figuring out how many users are keeping up enough >> to see a minor release. >> >> I assume 2.0 still takes weeks to get ready for RC and some time >>> for final >>> >> Yeah, even with the reduced # of tickets, it's still going to take >> quite a bit of work, and I'm struggling to finish off my last >> semester of college, so yeah, interim releases are good. >> >> On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Reinier Balt wrote: >> >> Well, we could do a 1.7.1 with just the last bug fix. Close 1.7 >>> then and concentrate on 2.0. I assume 2.0 still takes weeks to get >>> ready for RC and some time for final >>> Reinier >>> *Van:* Eric Allen [mailto:[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>] >>> *Verzonden:* maandag 22 maart 2010 15:03 >>> *Aan:* Reinier Balt >>> *CC:* track-discuss >>> *Onderwerp:* Re: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release >>> >>> Awesome! Thanks for cleaning up the tickets. This makes 2.0 look a >>> lot more manageable. Should we just move the remaining 1.7.1 >>> tickets over to 2.0, since we're giving up on that release? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Reinier Balt <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> For 1.7.1 I reduced the tickets to a few that are relevant and >>> present in >>> 2.0 too, including one that makes your database inconsistent. >>> I closed some of them because of your jQuery work, i.e. not fixing >>> stuff >>> that is fixed for 2.0. >>> >>> I removed myself from a lot of tickets so other can pick them up. >>> I hope to >>> fix some of the recurring todo tickets. >>> >>> Reinier >>> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>> Van: [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> [mailto:[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>] Namens Eric >>> Allen >>> Verzonden: zondag 14 maart 2010 22:18 >>> Aan: track-discuss >>> >>> Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release >>> >>> I think before we even think about a pre-release, we need to >>> whittle down >>> the number of tickets to a reasonable level. Reinier, you have a >>> ton of >>> Accepted tickets. Do you want to push some of those off to 2.1, >>> New, or >>> assign them to me? >>> >>> As for 1.7.1, which of those tickets are still an issue in master? >>> >>> On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:20 AM, Reinier Balt wrote: >>> >>> > We could go for a pre-release which gives us some more testing of >>> the >>> > current development tree. >>> > There is a 1.7.1 bug that is impacting 1.8 too. I think we could >>> forget >>> > about releasing 1.7.1 >>> > given the available time :-( >>> > >>> > I'll try to pick up some of the recurring stuff the coming days, >>> but my >>> > spare time is very much >>> > fragmented lately. >>> > >>> > Reinier >>> > >>> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>> > Van: [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > [mailto:[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>] Namens BSAG >>> > Verzonden: zondag 7 maart 2010 15:52 >>> > Aan: Eric Allen >>> > CC: track-discuss >>> > Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release >>> > >>> > On 07/03/2010 0:23, Eric Allen wrote: >>> >> We really need to push out a new release of Tracks in the near >>> future, >>> >> here. Dependencies and the jQuery stuff seem to be pretty stable >>> at this >>> >> point, so I think we're close! The major outstanding issues seem >>> to be >>> >> surrounding recurring todos. Reinier, care to chime in? We have >>> almost >>> >> 50 open tickets on milestone 1.8 right now, so we need to start >>> pushing >>> >> things out. I'm not an admin on Assembla, so I can't create a 2.0 >>> >> milestone. Reinier or bsag, can you make me an admin so I can move >>> >> things around for the release? >>> > >>> > I'm even more busy than ever, I'm afraid, so I'm not going to >>> have much >>> > time to help out :-( >>> > >>> > However, I have added you as an admin on Assembla, Eric, so you >>> should >>> > be able to move things around now. >>> > >>> > cheers, >>> > >>> > bsag >>> > >>> > -- >>> > but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek >>> > http://www.rousette.org.uk >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Tracks-discuss mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tracks-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tracks-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >> > > > -- > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tracks-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
