On 03/04/10 01:31, Eric Allen wrote:
Thanks for pitching in, Orlando! The patches were simple enough that I
can just manually add them, so submitting them as comments works fine.
Are you working with a git working copy of Tracks or a downloaded
snapshot? If you've gotten the source with "git clone", you can just run
"git diff > foo.patch" to generate a patch file that's really easy for
us to apply. Anything works though, if you're contributing! ;-)
For #898: The tracks.js file is actually a bundle created by Rails
automatically, so you need to go back and edit the appropriate source
.js file and delete the tracks.js file to regenerate it. I've committed
your changes, and it's much better! Thanks for tracking that down.
As for #843, I can't seem to duplicate the issue. Can you post a more
specific scenario to reproduce the bug?
Hmm - i went back and also failed to reproduce it!
As I remember it (probably an issue that was fixed ages ago!) - putting
a comment like this into the comments box for a todo:
this
has
single
linebreaks
would result in a comment that was viewed as:
this has single linebreaks
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Orlando Richards
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I've been inspired to see if I could help at all - so I've submitted
comments to a couple of tickets. Perhaps naively, I reckon they can
just be patched into the source (by someone who knows how to do that
- I have no chance!) and closed.
Tickets are:
843 Newline rendering in notes is scetchy.
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/843-newline-rendering-in-notes-is-scetchy-
898 Edit popup for actions goes away too quickly
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/898-edit-popup-for-actions-goes-away-too-quickly
Hope that's of some use!
--
Orlando.
On 02/04/2010 18:47, Eric Allen wrote:
I set a tentative date of April 30th for the 2.0 release when I
re-named
1.8. How does that sound to everybody? Maybe we do the RC at the
end of
April and release in May?
I just closed 10 tickets today and pushed a few more off to 2.1,
so the
pile is looking really manageable. What else is blocking 2.0RC1?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Eric Allen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
Well, we could do a 1.7.1 with just the last bug fix.
Okay, that makes sense. If we could get download stats, that
would
be a great way of figuring out how many users are keeping up
enough
to see a minor release.
I assume 2.0 still takes weeks to get ready for RC and
some time
for final
Yeah, even with the reduced # of tickets, it's still going
to take
quite a bit of work, and I'm struggling to finish off my last
semester of college, so yeah, interim releases are good.
On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Reinier Balt wrote:
Well, we could do a 1.7.1 with just the last bug fix.
Close 1.7
then and concentrate on 2.0. I assume 2.0 still takes
weeks to get
ready for RC and some time for final
Reinier
*Van:* Eric Allen [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>]
*Verzonden:* maandag 22 maart 2010 15:03
*Aan:* Reinier Balt
*CC:* track-discuss
*Onderwerp:* Re: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release
Awesome! Thanks for cleaning up the tickets. This makes
2.0 look a
lot more manageable. Should we just move the remaining 1.7.1
tickets over to 2.0, since we're giving up on that release?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Reinier Balt
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
For 1.7.1 I reduced the tickets to a few that are
relevant and
present in
2.0 too, including one that makes your database
inconsistent.
I closed some of them because of your jQuery work, i.e.
not fixing
stuff
that is fixed for 2.0.
I removed myself from a lot of tickets so other can pick
them up.
I hope to
fix some of the recurring todo tickets.
Reinier
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>]
Namens Eric
Allen
Verzonden: zondag 14 maart 2010 22:18
Aan: track-discuss
Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release
I think before we even think about a pre-release, we need to
whittle down
the number of tickets to a reasonable level. Reinier,
you have a
ton of
Accepted tickets. Do you want to push some of those off
to 2.1,
New, or
assign them to me?
As for 1.7.1, which of those tickets are still an issue
in master?
On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:20 AM, Reinier Balt wrote:
> We could go for a pre-release which gives us some more
testing of the
> current development tree.
> There is a 1.7.1 bug that is impacting 1.8 too. I think
we could
forget
> about releasing 1.7.1
> given the available time :-(
>
> I'll try to pick up some of the recurring stuff the
coming days,
but my
> spare time is very much
> fragmented lately.
>
> Reinier
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>]
Namens BSAG
> Verzonden: zondag 7 maart 2010 15:52
> Aan: Eric Allen
> CC: track-discuss
> Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: 2.0 release
>
> On 07/03/2010 0:23, Eric Allen wrote:
>> We really need to push out a new release of Tracks in
the near
future,
>> here. Dependencies and the jQuery stuff seem to be
pretty stable
at this
>> point, so I think we're close! The major outstanding
issues seem
to be
>> surrounding recurring todos. Reinier, care to chime in?
We have
almost
>> 50 open tickets on milestone 1.8 right now, so we need
to start
pushing
>> things out. I'm not an admin on Assembla, so I can't
create a 2.0
>> milestone. Reinier or bsag, can you make me an admin so
I can move
>> things around for the release?
>
> I'm even more busy than ever, I'm afraid, so I'm not going to
have much
> time to help out :-(
>
> However, I have added you as an admin on Assembla, Eric,
so you
should
> be able to move things around now.
>
> cheers,
>
> bsag
>
> --
> but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek
> http://www.rousette.org.uk
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
--
--
Dr Orlando Richards
Information Services
IT Infrastructure Division
Unix Section
Tel: 0131 650 4994
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
