On 05/06/2010 09:44 AM, Eric Allen wrote:
It would be nice if it were slightly more obvious what is going
on--perhaps subtly flash or highlight the title of the context?
Also, my first instinct was to drop on the title of the context
itself, so maybe making that a drop target as well?
Yeah, I like both of those suggestions. I think keeping the dashed
drop target is good, but having both can't hurt, right?
Both would be good, or perhaps easier could be to move the dashed drop
zone to just above the first todo in the context block? Also, maybe make
drop zone could stand out more. a darker grey or green dashed line? Or
instead of dashed box, maybe a shaded box. While I am on a roll: maybe
include the todo textfield as the part of the grabable area? Currently,
hovering over the textfield makes a text cursor. This could make it
easier to grab. The yellow tooltip needs to be updated to add info on
context drag/drop.
Also, playing with it a bit more, I realized that (I think) at
some point the drop target for drag/drop dependencies got small-
it went from being the whole task (I think?) to just the small
icon. That, again, makes it a little harder to do.
Hmm. I deliberately shrunk it so that we could eventually add drag &
drop re-ordering of tasks, although I'm somewhat opposed to that idea
in the first place. How much worse is the smaller target for you?
On the drop off, possibly include the textfield in the target zone for
dependency while still keeping the icon that changes blue when you hit
the zone.
Any of these are just nice to haves. Love the new functionality. Using
it frequently. Thanks
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Eric Allen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback! I was pushing for an April release of
2.0, which
> didn't happen, but I'm going to have much more time to wrap up
the last
> dozen or so bugs by the end of May.
Sweet.
>> 2) Particular thanks for whoever implemented
drag-to-change-contexts; that
>> is a nice little feature that I think I'll end up using a *lot*.
>
> You're welcome! It wasn't too hard to do, and it really improved my
> workflow. What do you think about the UI I've done for it?
There's still
> something a little weird awkward about the UI to me.
It would be nice if it were slightly more obvious what is going on-
perhaps subtly flash or highlight the title of the context? Also, my
first instinct was to drop on the title of the context itself, so
maybe making that a drop target as well?
Also, playing with it a bit more, I realized that (I think) at some
point the drop target for drag/drop dependencies got small- it went
from being the whole task (I think?) to just the small icon. That,
again, makes it a little harder to do.
Luis
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Upgraded to trunk yesterday:
>> 1) Trunk appears to be working fine for me in 48 hours of heavy
use;
>> thanks to everyone who has contributed.
>> 2) Particular thanks for whoever implemented
drag-to-change-contexts;
>> that is a nice little feature that I think I'll end up using a
*lot*.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Luis
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tracks-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
