On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Eric Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >> It would be nice if it were slightly more obvious what is going >> on--perhaps subtly flash or highlight the title of the context? Also, >> my first instinct was to drop on the title of the context itself, so maybe >> making that a drop target as well? > > Yeah, I like both of those suggestions. I think keeping the dashed drop > target is good, but having both can't hurt, right?
Yeah, I think that is right. >> Also, playing with it a bit more, I realized that (I think) at some point >> the drop target for drag/drop dependencies got small- it went from being the >> whole task (I think?) to just the small icon. That, again, makes it a little >> harder to do. > > Hmm. I deliberately shrunk it so that we could eventually add drag & drop > re-ordering of tasks, although I'm somewhat opposed to that idea in the > first place. How much worse is the smaller target for you? I find it pretty irritating to hit the smaller target; hard to quantify how much worse it is, really. More generally, I guess I'm not a fan of various mechanisms for prioritization- I keep coming back to the GTD book, which I think tends to focus on keeping lists trimmed/clean rather than letting them blow out of proportion and then using stars, re-ordering, etc. But then again it has been a while since I read the book, and I know we're not trying to be doctrinaire here :) Luis _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
