> > I find it pretty irritating to hit the smaller target; hard to quantify how > much worse it is, really.
Okay, I'll back it out. At this point there's no real reason to have the small target. More generally, I guess I'm not a fan of various mechanisms for prioritization- I keep coming back to the GTD book, which I think tends to focus on keeping lists trimmed/clean rather than letting them blow out of proportion and then using stars, re-ordering, etc. But then again it has been a while since I read the book, and I know we're not trying to be doctrinaire here :) I totally agree with you about prioritization. As far as I'm concerned, tickets that try to get us to add some kind of ordering or prioritization are inherently invalid, but I do my best to be open-minded. We don't seem to have particularly strong sentiment in this direction, though, so I feel comfortable ignoring the suggestion (to add prioritization) for now :) On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Eric Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It would be nice if it were slightly more obvious what is going > >> on--perhaps subtly flash or highlight the title of the context? Also, > >> my first instinct was to drop on the title of the context itself, > so maybe > >> making that a drop target as well? > > > > Yeah, I like both of those suggestions. I think keeping the dashed drop > > target is good, but having both can't hurt, right? > > Yeah, I think that is right. > > >> Also, playing with it a bit more, I realized that (I think) at > some point > >> the drop target for drag/drop dependencies got small- it went from being > the > >> whole task (I think?) to just the small icon. That, again, makes it a > little > >> harder to do. > > > > Hmm. I deliberately shrunk it so that we could eventually add drag & drop > > re-ordering of tasks, although I'm somewhat opposed to that idea in the > > first place. How much worse is the smaller target for you? > > I find it pretty irritating to hit the smaller target; hard to > quantify how much worse it is, really. > > More generally, I guess I'm not a fan of various mechanisms for > prioritization- I keep coming back to the GTD book, which I think > tends to focus on keeping lists trimmed/clean rather than letting them > blow out of proportion and then using stars, re-ordering, etc. But > then again it has been a while since I read the book, and I know we're > not trying to be doctrinaire here :) > > Luis >
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
