#115: Verify that recommended consistency checking algorithm is correct
Comment (by [email protected]): Sorry, should have been clearer: I have no doubt the algorithm is correct, however I managed to interpret it in a way that is not :) So I'd like lo go over the code vs. the document to clarify the points where I mis-interpreted the text. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/115#comment:2> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
