#115: Verify that recommended consistency checking algorithm is correct Changes (by [email protected]):
* milestone: review => Comment: Removing review milestone. Per offline clarification, we should make sure that the test cases in test_rfc_algorithms.py cover positive and negative cases (by copying the concepts from https://github.com/google/certificate- transparency/blob/master/cpp/merkletree/merkle_tree_test.cc) then make sure the algorithm identifies both success and failure correctly. -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/115#comment:8> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
