#115: Verify that recommended consistency checking algorithm is correct

Comment (by [email protected]):

 Inclusion proof description exactly matches code, with no room for
 interpretation.

-- 
------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  [email protected]  |       Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  defect            |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major             |   Milestone:
Component:  rfc6962-bis       |     Version:
 Severity:  -                 |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                    |
------------------------------+----------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/115#comment:4>
trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/>

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to